Comment

Comment on Bethesda Game Studios workers have unionized

<- View Parent

rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Consent doesn’t transfer responsibility.

I agree.

Ancaps see the logic of exit, but ignore the dual logic of commitment and voice e.g. democracy and social property

Ancaps delegate this to free will.

Including

… but non-market mechanisms and mutual aid should flourish within groups.

Only how do you form a group with its resources without property of individuals as its components?

source

Sort:hotnew top

jlou@mastodon.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
So you agree that the employer-employee contract must be abolished due to it violating workers' inalienable right to workplace democracy?
The way collective property works is that each group member that possesses collective property self-assess and declares the price they would be willing to turn over the possession to another group member. Then, they pay a percentage fee on this self-assessed price to the group. Groups democratically decide what to do with the collective funds @technology
source
- rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  So you agree that the employer-employee contract must be abolished due to it violating workers’ inalienable right to workplace democracy?
  
  No, just that you can’t offload responsibility via contract. I agree though that contract under clear pressure is negligible.
  
  The way collective property works is that each group member that possesses collective property self-assess and declares the price they would be willing to turn over the possession to another group member. Then, they pay a percentage fee on this self-assessed price to the group. Groups democratically decide what to do with the collective funds
  
  So a group can make the fee zero and thus have a usual ancap community?
  
  source
  - jlou@mastodon.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    The employment contract is such a contract. It involves a legal transfer of legal responsibility for the positive and negative results of production from the employees to the solely the employer. However, there is no corresponding de facto transfer of de facto responsibility. The contract is unfulfillable.
    Groups set exit fees for transferring out community value. They can lower the exit fees for mutually-recognized groups, and exclude "groups" with no public goods funding
    @technology
    source
    rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    The employment contract is such a contract. It involves a legal transfer of legal responsibility for the positive and negative results of production from the employees to the solely the employer. However, there is no corresponding de facto transfer of de facto responsibility. The contract is unfulfillable.
    
    Funny that I have never looked at it from this particular point.
    
    Groups set exit fees for transferring out community value. They can lower the exit fees for mutually-recognized groups, and exclude “groups” with no public goods funding
    
    Can one person be a group?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments