Nah. They will cross licence with the other big players effectively closing the market to anyone they don’t bless.
Comment on The AI-focused COPIED Act would make removing digital watermarks illegal
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months agoDisney won’t sell licenses.
They’ll keep their monopoly on 95% of the training data on the market for entertainment content.
fuzzzerd@programming.dev 2 months ago
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
They already own all the big players.
afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I am not understanding. They will now be even more effective at what they do and will be building a tech stack that no one else has access to and you think this is a win for the little guy?
If you owned a store, then a Walmart setup next to it and Walmart rolled out some new barcode system that your scanners didn’t work on how the hell would that benefit you?
Not only are the already bigger, they are getting efficiencies they aren’t sharing with your business. You want open protocols, you want tool sharing, you want the market as a whole to be getting more efficient. You don’t want some company that already won able to pulverize by sheer size anyone who competes.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
No, it’s very obviously not a win for the little guy.
If you can’t learn from public performances, art dies. That’s all of art for thousands of years.
sab@lemmy.world 2 months ago
So what will happen to art if we only disallow AI models from learning from copyrighted performances, whilst still allowing them to do so from public domain and licensed works (and obviously not changing anything for humans who seek inspiration)?
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Disney will own all of it.
Because they already own most of it and now have a massive productivity advantage.