Comment on Headlines

• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Grouping up a whole set of countries, ethnicities, histories and conflicts into a “middle east” category and call treating it all as a homogenous “non-black and white” issue is racist, sorry.

  nothing about conflicts in that area (including the topic at hand) is black and white

  Thank you for ignoring the inconvenient part of my previous comment. Please tell me how the first Nakba isn’t black and white.

  source

  • Freefall@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It is the name of that region and conflicts within it are still conflicts in the Middle East. Still not racist, sorry. You get this worked up over people mentioning Europe or “The West”?

    source

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If people grouped up every single geopolitical conflict within Europe under a single category of equally non-black and whiteness, they’d be ignorant to do so. When western people do that with the middle east, it’s just an excuse to keep their minds free of it and dismiss it all and the responsibility of their governments.

      Funnily enough, you know where in middle east there weren’t these “non-black and white” issues until three decades ago? Kazakhstan. Uzbekistan. Turkmenistan. Tajikistan. Azerbaijan. Kyrgyzstan. I wonder if there’s something black and white about the whole thing now…

      source