Comment on This sub needs more Meteorology history memes.

<- View Parent
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

I reject the idea that every meme needs a personal explanation, a lesson, or a long comment thread attached to it. Memes are also casual content. People should be allowed to see something funny, vote, comment if they want, and move on.

I think that in a community that has a special interest, one should be able to explain one’s postings. Because:

If there is a concrete problem with a post, say what it is.

I tried that multiple times. I pointed out mistakes, errors and false information in your memes, but there was literally no reaction. This is the first time I see you reacting to anything.

Calling all frequent sharing “indiscriminate dumping”

That is not what I did though. I said it seems like indiscriminate dumping because you never seemed to bother to engage in discussion, do not deliver context (as it was normal before you started posting), etc. You even copied the title here that doesn’t make sense for this platform. That’s why I call it mindless.

The practical issue is activity. In the latest 24-hour window, this community had 14 posts; I supplied 12 of them. r/HistoryMemes had roughly 40 posts in the same window.

What is the context of these numbers though? How many different users made these reddit posts, how many members does the reddit sub has compared to this community, how many comments by how many commentors etc?

When I see a community and almost every post is made by the same user, I am turned away, because that does not speak of a healthy community. It looks like the personal platform of an individual.
When I see a special interest community where almost every post is made by the same user, I do not expect to see meaningful exchange about the topic. Had I come here after you became active, I would not have subscribed.

And if you do not want to be on reddit, don’t be there.

original
Sort:hotnewtop