Fuck that. It absolutely is not a norm to have anyone with an internet connection watch you drink, and making a camera publicly accessible should automatically revoke your liquor license.
Comment on People in San Francisco Are Mad That a New App Lets You Spy on Bars to See How Busy They Are
CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’m generally in favor of privacy, but a bar is public place. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Unless they’re putting cameras in the bathrooms, I don’t see how this is an issue. They likely already have security cameras that are recording, this just makes some of those publicly viewable. Other than an additional layer of convenience, how is this any different from walking into a bar, seeing it’s packed, and leaving.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Sounds like you just made that up.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
People absolutely will be stalked and attacked as a direct result of this insane horseshit if it is not shut down.
It is unconditionally not acceptable.
Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I meant the losing your license part. The rest is NSAs wet dream.
aaaa@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’m shocked at what an unpopular thought this is. Like… If you go out in public, there’s a very real risk that people in public will see you. If that’s a concern you have, then you should take steps to not be seen in public. To me, that would mean not making my presence obvious when visiting a bar.
Camera or not, if people are looking for you, they will find ways to look for you in public places. You should always assume you’re being watched, because you probably already are.
helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The potential for misue is too great.
Security cams are not available to anyone - only the bar staff has (hopefully limited) access to the video. While everything is recorded, unless something happens you can be confident the video will end up deleted.
There’s a difference from being watched by some creep through the window and being watched by a dozen creeps wanking off to you in a basment.
CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I would say the potential for misuse, while definitely present, is outweighed by the potential benefits.
A creep watching you from their basement is less likely to act on their dangerous impulses.
An overcrowded bar, poses a lot of risks in itself and the ability to determine how crowded the bar is without having to be physically present can mitigate your exposure to those risks.
In a crowded bar you have a higher risk of being drugged or assaulted because security and staff will likely be distracted or simply unable to notice and intervene. Also, in the event of an emergency that requires you to be able exit quickly, such as a fire or earthquake not only will it be much more difficult to leave it’s also more likely that people will panic and exasperate the problem.
Is a camera with a public live feed the best way to achieve that? No, probably not. But it’s simple, cheap, and gets the job done.
A bar is also a public venue. In a public place you have absolutely no reasonable expectation of privacy. So, while in most circumstances it’s unreasonable to expect that you’re being recorded, it’s equally unreasonable to expect that you’re not.
catloaf@lemm.ee 4 months ago
You don’t need a video feed to determine how busy a place is. Google maps already does this via people with location reporting turned on.