Comment on Microsoft’s AI boss thinks it’s perfectly OK to steal content if it’s on the open web
Womble@lemmy.world 3 days agoDidnt you hear? We stan draconian IP laws now because AI bad.
Comment on Microsoft’s AI boss thinks it’s perfectly OK to steal content if it’s on the open web
Womble@lemmy.world 3 days agoDidnt you hear? We stan draconian IP laws now because AI bad.
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Is it that or is it that the laws are selectively applied on little guys and ignored once you make enough money? It certainly looks that way. Once you’ve achieved a level of “fuck you money” it doesn’t matter how unscrupulously you got there.
Examples:
The Pirate Bay: Only made enough money to run the site and keep the admins living a middle class lifestyle.
VERDICT: Bad, wrong, and evil. Must be put in jail.
OpenAI: Claims to be non-profit, then spins off for-profit wing. Makes a mint in a deal with Microsoft.
VERDICT: Only the goodest of good people and we must allow them to continue doing so.
The IP laws are stupid but letting fucking rich twats get away with it while regular people will still get fucked by the same rules is kind of a fucking stupid ass hill to die on.
Grimy@lemmy.world 3 days ago
The laws are currently the same for everyone when it comes to what you can use to train an AI with. I, as an individual, can use whatever public facing data I wish to build or fine tune AI models, same as Microsoft.
If we make copyright laws even stronger, the only one getting locked out of the game are the little guys. Microsoft, google and company can afford to pay ridiculous prices for datasets. What they don’t own mainly comes from aggregators like Reddit, Getty, Instagram and Stack.
Boosting copyright laws essentially kill all legal forms of open source AI. It would force the open source scene to go underground as a pirate network and lead to the scenario you mentioned.
Womble@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Yes, it is a travesty that people are being hounded for sharing information, but the solution to that isn’t to lock up information tighter by restricting access to the open web and saying if you download something we put up to be freely accessed and then use it in a way we don’t like you own us.
0x0@programming.dev 2 days ago
That’s law in general…