As renewables becomes cheaper and easier to implement they will naturally supplant fossil fuel just by the nature of economics.
Comment on Q: “Are we doomed?” A: “We would be, if not for the amazing developments in renewable energy.”
SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 4 months ago
More and better renewable energy is great. The problem is that we’re not getting rid of the other stuff
Rolder@reddthat.com 4 months ago
LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 months ago
You’re right, we’ve got to get rid of fossil fuel. As one example, the article talks about how energy storage has reduced the need for gas peaker plants. In California in April the power required from those plants was half what it’s been in April the prior three years.
Still plenty of progress that needs to be made, but what’s notable is that it’s now cheaper for a business to turn to green energy and storage to solve a problem. There’s not an incentive to build new polluting tech. So while the impact of climate change is going to get worse (because those emissions and warming are already baked in) the business argument for fossil fuel is no longer viable.
GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 4 months ago
We are, though. Coal use in the United States has cut in half in the last 15 years, and it’s still on a steep downward slope. Even as natural gas (which emits roughly half the CO2 per unit energy as coal) increased over the same time period, our total emissions from energy consumption has dropped from about 6 billion tons to 4.8 billion tons.
The progress we’re making might be slower than many of us would like, but we’re also at a tipping point where we’re making many fossil fuels simply uneconomical. And that’s the key: to make polluting costly enough that big businesses won’t want to.