Comment

Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”?

Pika@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

I’m not sure of the complaint, is the tag not accurate? If you use AI to make something are you not making it with ai? Like if I use strawberry to make a cake would the tag made with strawberries be inaccurate?

Like I failed to see the argument, if you don’t want to be labeled as something accurate don’t use it otherwise deal with it.

source

Sort:hotnew top

efstajas@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
I do think it’s a problem when 100% of people seeing “made with AI” will assume the entire thing is AI-generated, even if all you did was use AI for a minor touch-up. If it’s really that trigger happy right now, I think it’d make sense for it to be dialled down a bit.

source
Bertuccio@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
The complaint the photographer is making is that it’s an actual image where a small portion is made or changed with AI.

They list expanding the edges of the image to change the aspect ratio and removing flaws, unwanted objects etc.

Removing flaws and objects at least is a task that predates computers - people changed the actual negatives, and tools to do it have improved that a computer can basically do it all for you.

I think people should just say how they modified the image - AI or not - since airbrushed skin, artificial slimming, and such have been common complaints before AI manipulation, and AI just makes those same problematic things easier.

source
femtech@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
Would all my photos taking on a pixel or iPhone have this label then?

source
Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
The biggest use of AI in my editing flow is masking. I can spend half an hour selecting all the edges of a person as well as I can, or I can click the button to select people. Either way I do the rest of my edits as normal.

source