Comment on Is possible to run a LLM on a mini-pc like the GMKtec K8 and K9?

• entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I believe commercial LLMs have some kind of watermark when you apply AI for grammar and fixing in general, so I just need an AI to make these works undetectable with a private LLM.

  That’s not how it works, sorry.

  source

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I was talking about that with a friend some days ago, and they made an experiment, they just made the AI correct punctuation errors of a text document, no words at all which you can easily add manually, and the anti-AI system target 99% AI made, I don’t know how to explain that, maybe the text was AI generated also IDK or there is a watermark in some place, a pattern or something.

    source

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Just that they’re no easier to make fool an anti-AI system than using ChatGPT, Gemini, Bing, or Claude. Those AI detectors also give false positives on works made by humans. They’re unreliable in the first place.

      Basically, they’re “boring text detectors” more than anything else.

      source

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I have a friend who is running a business of doing homework on demand, he is using AI to do the work, he got back a work because AI generated content was detected on it, he used to employ real people to do the work but anyway real people used AI too sometimes, so he knows I’m a “hacker” LMAO and asked me if I knew any way to fool the anti-AI systems, I thought about running a private LLM and training it with real human generated content like ebooks depending on the subject of the work, do you think it could be possible to fool these things with this method?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • al4s@feddit.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      LLMs work by always predicting the next most likely token and LLM detection works by checking how often the next most likely token was chosen. You can tell the LLM to choose less likely tokens more often (turn up the heat parameter) but you will only get gibberish out if you do. So no, there is not.

      source

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        What about if you train the AI with human generated content? For example e-books?

        source
    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      LLMs have a very predictable and consistent approach to grammar, punctuation, style and general cadence which is easily identifiable when compared to human written content. It’s kind of a watermark but it’s one the creators are aware of and are seeking to remove. That means if you want to use LLMs as a writing aid of any sort and want it to read somewhat naturally, you’ll have to either get it to generate bullet points and expand on them yourself, or get it to generate the content then rewrite it word for word in a style you’d write it in.

      source
• hperrin@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Maybe just write the academic works yourself, then they should pass.

  source

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    My friend used to employ several people for that, but they started using AI to work less so he decided to start doing by his own with AI instead of paying someone else to do the same.

    source

    • hperrin@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      So your “friend’s” unethical business hired unethical workers and now you’ve come here to ask for advice on running your unethical business without paying anyone. Got it.

      source

      • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Not exactly if you have relevant information reach me a PM and we can accord and agreement…

        source
• MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Something with a GPU that’s good for LLMs would be best.

  source