Presumably you’d have a QPU in your regular computer, like with other accelerators for graphics etc
Comment on Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs
Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 week agoQuantum computers won’t displace traditional computers. There’s certain niche use-cases for which quantum computers can become wildly faster in the future. But for most calculations we do today, they’re just unreliable. So, they’ll mostly coexist.
amanda@aggregatet.org 1 week ago
Tinidril@midwest.social 1 week ago
There would have to be some kind of currently unforseen breakthroughs before something like that would be even remotely possible. In all likelihood, quantum computing would stay in specialized data centers. For the problems quantum would solve, there is really no advantage to having it local anyways.
amanda@aggregatet.org 1 week ago
I assume we need a lot of breakthroughs to even have useful quantum computing at all, but sure.
Isn’t quantum encryption interesting for end users?
hades@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Quantum encryption isn’t something quantum computers can even do. It’s not just transforming bits into other bits, it’s about building entirely new security properties based on physical properties of matter.
So, even if it is interesting for end users, they would need dedicated hardware anyway.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 week ago
In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.