Probably not in consumer grade products in any foreseeable future.
Comment on Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs
unreachable@lemmy.world 1 week ago
so i guess the next bit after 64 cpu is qu-bit, quantum bit
magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 week ago
Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Quantum computers won’t displace traditional computers. There’s certain niche use-cases for which quantum computers can become wildly faster in the future. But for most calculations we do today, they’re just unreliable. So, they’ll mostly coexist.
UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 week ago
In other words like GPUs. GPUs suck ass at complex calculations. They however, work great for a large number of easy calculations, which is what is needed for graphics processing.
amanda@aggregatet.org 1 week ago
Presumably you’d have a QPU in your regular computer, like with other accelerators for graphics etc
Tinidril@midwest.social 1 week ago
There would have to be some kind of currently unforseen breakthroughs before something like that would be even remotely possible. In all likelihood, quantum computing would stay in specialized data centers. For the problems quantum would solve, there is really no advantage to having it local anyways.
amanda@aggregatet.org 1 week ago
I assume we need a lot of breakthroughs to even have useful quantum computing at all, but sure.
Isn’t quantum encryption interesting for end users?