are there even any counterexamples?
Actually, there are a large number of billionaires whose primary assets are literally property.
forbes.com/…/the-richest-real-estate-billionaires…
I had hoped the point would be pretty obvious. Most people’s homes represent a significant part of their net worth, often a majority of their assets. The unrealized gains on that are taxed.
But the real question is, do you think they should be? 'Cause I’m with you if you say no. Unrealized gains should not be taxed at all, it makes no sense.
deathbird@mander.xyz 4 months ago
It is kinda weird that real estate gets taxed just for existing and being held, but stocks, which supposedly represent a fraction of a mass of real wealth too, don’t get taxed while just being held.