5 people could do it though.
I mean, distributing it isn’t a small feat. Plus you need to manage subscriptions, billings, CMS, a front end to navigate the content, etc.
That’s no small amount of work, even if they used out of the box solutions for many layers.
themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
ripcord@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Depends how many users.
But yeah a lot.
iopq@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Both Wikipedia and Stack Overflow just have a few dozen fast servers despite being some of the world’s highest trafficked websites
calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 months ago
The entire content of the wikipedia fits in a pen drive.
Streaming video is a lot more expensive than text and images.
Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 months ago
That is just the text content, Wikipedia has pictures and videos as well. Not to mention the other Wikimedia projects
calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I doubt Wikimedia streams even 0.1% of what netflix does.
Tja@programming.dev 3 months ago
Not only that, stackoverflow does it using windows! (or used to, at least)
jonne@infosec.pub 3 months ago
All of those things already exist. Typically it’s just a Plex server running on a cloud service.
batmaniam@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Yeah like… Netflix has peering agreements and whatnot but… It’s not 2005.