There’s no need for it to be inside the freezer to see who’s going into it.
Comment on Maybe those 20 seconds were because of the lack of getting raises?
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 months agoOne that works in a walk in freezer?
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 months ago
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 months ago
These people are presumably paid to go into the freezer. If they weren’t going into the freezer that would be a problem. It’s going into the freezer and doing whip-its is the problem.
I was going to say then that you’d need to prove the person was actually doing whip-its and not their job, but I’m guessing this is America and it’s not actually required to have a reason to euthanise underperforming employees.
Juice@midwest.social 5 months ago
Electronics work better in the cold
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 months ago
WiFi works poorly behind insulation.
Cameras don’t do great covered in frost.
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 5 months ago
Yup, they work to about -10C
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 months ago
Walk in freezers are usually aimed at -18C, but that isn’t the main problem with trying to get a WiFi camera to work behind several inches of insulation.
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 5 months ago
That’s fair. Fortunately poe or wired cameras are even cheaper.
Plus, you don’t super need it inside the freezer, if you’re smart enough to recognize patterns (but I doubt that manager is)
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 months ago
They might be cheaper, but then you have to either have a cable coming in the door of the freezer, or drill a hole in your $10k freezer’s wall.
In my country you’d definitely need to have video footage to accuse someone of abusing aerosols at work, but yes in some less civilised places a general pattern might be enough to accuse someone and hope they weren’t just going in there to do their job.
davidgro@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Ah, was guessing that just meant the employee entrance or walkway or something.