Comment on May 13, 1985
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 month agoThat’s whataboutism, multiple wrongs don’t make a right and none of MOVE’s actions are forgiven by this argument.
Comment on May 13, 1985
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 month agoThat’s whataboutism, multiple wrongs don’t make a right and none of MOVE’s actions are forgiven by this argument.
Nevoic@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Calling this whataboutism is like responding to the claim “people have a biological urge to reproduce” as a naturalistic fallacy.
You’re using the word in sorta the right ballpark (I did make a comparison, e.g a “what about”), however not every time someone says “what about X” are they committing a fallacy.
My entire point was how terrorist is a loaded word, that we only use it to describe one side (the side not in power), even though the technical definition obviously fits organizations in power.
There were native american terror groups, yet the U.S government that literally genocided millions of native Americans isn’t a terror organization, despite their use of terror and violence to achieve political goals. It’s a word with clear problematic etymology.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
The CIA supporting Fascism in South America has fuck all to do with a confrontation between militarized police and a cult on May 13th 1985 in Philadelphia. If you think that’s not whataboutism then you’re dumb as a sack of bricks.
Nevoic@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Yeah no need to get this hostile.
The word “terrorist” was used, and getting into the etymology of the word is best exemplified by how large “non-terrorist” organizations operate exactly like large terrorist organizations.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Yeah but what about the CIA, right? Those are an example of terrorists, right? But yeah what about Hillary Clinton’s Emails? But what about the cost of recycling solar? What about it, right? What about those, you got an answer for those?