Comment on Wireless Shower Head

editilly@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  isn’t something based in a fault of understanding of the real world

  You don't think the idea of a "wireless" shower head is based on a fault of understanding? It's stupid as fuck.

  source

  • editilly@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A wireless showerhead is clearly impossible… if you don’t have a machine that works on very little energy and somehow was able to store enough hydrogen while also sucking in oxygen to make water

    Say we had technology so efficient to make thus process possible, to make 1 liter of water (1 kg) you just need 1/9 of a kg of hydrogen, so if your showehead stored 1 kg of hydrogen in an extremely enclosed space, you could "pull 9 liters of water out of the air

    Even if this device was possible, it would be extremely impractical, and would probably suffocate you by sucking all the o2 out of the air if you are in an enclosed space

    source
  • whataboutshutup@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s an intertaining experiment though.

    Some other showerthought show less curiousity but being misinformed.

    source

    • db2@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s an intertaining experiment though.

      an intertaining experiment

      intertaining

      source

      • whataboutshutup@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Entertaining, right. But what’s with zooming in onto this mistake?

        source
• Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m really digging how meta the question is.

  source
• FleetingTit@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  H2 and O2 tanks big enough for an entire shower would be quite bulky, especially because you’d still need to combine them quick enough to produce a steady stream of water but slow enough to not just burn the flesh off your bones (it’s rocket fuel after all).

  If you use fuel cells as a “reactor” you could power your house with the shower, though.

  source