You don’t compare the stats to the population in its entirety. That’s like trying to calculate how dangerous it is for cyclists on the road by using the entire population. Most Americans don’t even own a bike.
You don’t compare the stats to the population in its entirety. That’s like trying to calculate how dangerous it is for cyclists on the road by using the entire population. Most Americans don’t even own a bike.
parpol@programming.dev 6 months ago
You do for disease and suicide as it can happen to literally anyone.
If working for a specific company or being a whistleblower affects those statistics, the company should be held responsible anyway.
bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 months ago
No, the whole point is you don’t unless you’re specifically asking “how likely is it for anyone” which is not applicable here. That’s like me figure out how likely I am to die of diabetes within 24hrs when I don’t have diabetes. The answer is 0%, because I don’t have diabetes. You’re also denying the existence of more at-risk groups for things like suicide and illnesses. Different groups are more at risk than others.
parpol@programming.dev 6 months ago
bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 months ago
Here is my more elaborated-on answer
bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 months ago
He was admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. He was by default far more at risk than the general population.