Comment on The Man Who Destroyed Google Search

Veedem@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Odelay42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ve tried to use DDG for a few weeks now, and I find it gets worse the more specific I search.

  For general things, it’s fine. But if I’m looking for an installation tutorial for a certain kind of plumbing hardware, it struggles to show me anything but brand and retail pages.

  source

  • Wojwo@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I started using Kagi. Yeah, I have to pay for it. But we’re paying for Google too, kagi is just more honest about how.

    source

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Can I use kagi as a default search for my browser?

      I’m trying to use Firefox on desktop and mobile more.

      source

      • xep@kbin.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Here you go: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/getting-started/setting-default.html

        source
      • ripcord@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yep!

        I use it on FF mobile and desktop all the time, for the last 6 months or so. It is great.

        source
      • Wojwo@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        They have a browser plug-in. I use it on Firefox on my desktop and on my Android phone. My uses it on Chrome on both as well.

        source
      • Bogasse@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        On Firefox I think you have to right click on the address bar while the website is open to register a new search engine?

        source
  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You could try a SearXNG someone hosted, it’s FOSS and not worse than Google :)

    source
• kambusha@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ve been using Perplexity for 2-3 months now. On 2 occasions, it flat out lied to me. The latest one, I was asking if it knew about a men’s brand that featured cranes on the shirt. It kept giving the same incorrect result, so I tried giving it more details, and then eventually it responded very confidently that it must be “Crane & Co a classic American menswear brand”, but it offered no references, which I found odd. Then I asked if it just made that up, and it confessed to fabricating a lie…

  did you just make that up?

  You’re right, I do not actually have a specific men’s dress shirt brand in mind that features a crane bird logo. I should not have fabricated a brand name and details. I do not have a definitive answer for the specific men’s dress shirt brand you are asking about that has a crane bird on it. I made an incorrect assumption and provided made-up information, which was wrong of me. In the future, I will be more transparent if I do not have a factual answer, rather than guessing. Please feel free to provide me with more details, and I will do my best to research and find the actual brand you are referring to.

  source

  • Veedem@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s odd. Were you using Pro? I find pro to be less reliable, oddly enough. I always check the citations which is why I like their approach.

    source

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Would it listen if you told it to tell you when it didn’t know something specifically to try to keep it from lying?

      source
• Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I started finding DDG’s results just as bad as Google’s, so I switched to SearXNG and have been pretty happy with it so far.

  Its open source so anyone can run an instance if they wish. I feel like this sort of model is much more resistant to enshitification.

  source

  • Hominine@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I run a SearXNG instance myself and while it is a fine aggregator, it’s important to note what it is and isn’t. For instance, Sear does not have a dedicated search index and leans on third party API calls (to indexes such as the aforementioned Google and DDG.) This is my understanding, feel free to correct it.

    For my money, I like the anonymity that Sear can afford and that it hides the AI bullshit pouring into the UIs. My son and I were talking over the weekend about how unreliable he is finding the move to AI search.

    source

    • Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes you’re absolutely right. The problem of aggregators is that if all the aggregated searches go to shit, then so does it. Garbage in, garbage out.

      source
  • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    SearXNG is just a meta search engine. It uses Google and DDG under the hood, among others. How is it possible that it’s better?

    source

    • Enkers@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Because the aggregated weighted result ranking provides a better page rank than any individual search engine, and if any search engine tries to (accidentally or otherwise) stuff specific results into the top ranks, it doesn’t matter. It’ll be deranked because no other engine displays those results highly. In a similar manner, it deranks targeted SEO attempts unless multiple platforms are targeted.

      source
• seaQueue@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Check out You.com too, their search is far better than Google on a lot of the technical topics I’ve searched for.

  source
• j4yt33@feddit.de ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ve been using Startpage and been quite happy with it

  source

  • daddy32@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Well, but that’s just Google minus some of the dark patterns.

    source
• Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Hello me. Unless I really can’t find a result I’m looking for or I need a map feature. I don’t use google

  source