I don’t think there’s a claim that the base itself was attacked, but instead that soldiers that were stationed at that base (which was a staging area for an invasion of Rafah) were attacked. The original Israeli source says that the soldiers were “near” the crossing. This seems like a far cry from the crossing itself being attacked, which is what the US articles claim or at least imply.
Comment on Western media launders israeli lies to manufacture more consent for Genocide
bleistift2@feddit.de 6 months agoI don’t see evidence that Hamas attacked the base, either. Is a hole in a tent and a picture of a tank that could be taken anywhere there is sand supposed to be evidence?
aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 6 months ago
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Read the highlighted text in the original post. Top left image.
The last two lines of the highlight.
Image
This article