I’d be curious to see if this actually enforced and for how long. I see companies cutting costs on security all the time. You can’t really trust them with anything else than creating and optimizing processes to make money. I’d rather see public regulators eat their turnover until they comply.
Comment on Microsoft ties executive pay to security following multiple failures and breaches
runswithjedi@lemmy.world 6 months ago
If you’re faced with the tradeoff between security and another priority, your answer is clear: Do security. In some cases, this will mean prioritizing security above other things we do, such as releasing new features or providing ongoing support for legacy systems.
I respect this. I’d be very happy if my boss told me this and I would feel empowered to build great products. I hope this sentiment spreads through the industry.
oce@jlai.lu 6 months ago
Serinus@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It is. Currently I don’t have a machine where I can both install and test code.
NCIS found the best solution to security years ago.
moon@lemmy.cafe 6 months ago
Sounds like they’ve been following this well… Except replace “security” with AI.
Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
Eh, my boss formally tells me this, too, but then the finances never allow for security anyways. It’s easy to state something like this towards journalists and then never get it down in practice.