Comment on Microsoft ties executive pay to security following multiple failures and breaches

henfredemars@infosec.pub ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• _edge@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Which is exactly why security should be on the executive agenda.

  source

  • 1luv8008135@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Tough but necessary. Irrefutably necessary.

    Technology has evolved at faster than we’ve been able to secure it and now we’re paying the price with enterprise and state level breaches, and global annual internet fraud at an all time high.

    And not just software but physical goods too. We’ve produced without any consideration for end of product life cycle management and now we’re in a plastic crisis.

    Completely different spheres of society but so similar in so many ways.

    source
• herrcaptain@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Judging by the last month of our Microsoft 365 tenant at work, they have plenty of room to improve. (Maybe by expanding in-house QA instead of relying on their customers.)

  One of the several issues we ran into in the last few weeks was that you couldn’t download or view attachments in the Outlook Web app if you’d been logged in for over 10ish minutes.According to the official advisory, this was due to “code put in production designed to increase reliability.” That was a funny way of making things reliable. It was over a week until they’d pushed a fix for that one - right around the time more Outlook issues started popping up.

  So yeah, while I agree with you that this might be tough - it might just be the best move they’ve made in a while. Maybe it’ll cause them to pay more attention to fixing bugs, and focus less on solving problems no one has. (Apparently we, as customers, have been dying for an AI button on our keyboard, to easily access an AI feature now baked into the taskbar.)

  source
• PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  And in Microsoft’s case you also have to preserve backwards compatibility. It’s one of the reasons the OS continues to dominate despite how it treats its users.

  source

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    …which often stands at odds with actual security.

    source

    • Serinus@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      They tend to make breaking changes every other release, which is always the release that people hate. (Granted, I don’t know wtf they’ve done with usability in Windows 11, but at least I can’t move the taskbar anymore.)

      source

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Well, that’s a breaking change for usability. I’m talking e.g. not allowing any random process to access the clipboard.

        source
• victorz@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “Not garbage” seems like a low bar to overcome for a company with such long experience. 😅

  source

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yet here we are… 🙄

    source
  • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Long experience of producing garbage code…

    source

    • victorz@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      What makes it garbage code? I mean, I don’t like Windows due to the user experience, but I have zero insight into the code itself because it’s proprietary closed-source and I’ve never worked at Microsoft.

      source

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I mean, there is actually leaked source code of Windows XP out there, because, you guessed it, they had a leak of that, too.

        But I actually said “garbage code”, because I didn’t want to say that everything they’ve ever done is purely garbage. I didn’t want to claim that I have particular insight into specifically their code.

        I have to assume, though, that their code quality is garbage, because:

        • Lots of MS software is buggy. In particular, all those security issues are bugs, too.

        • They keep backwards-compatibility to just absurd degrees. To this day, you can’t create a file that’s called “aux”, for example, because at some point, they had to block that to retrofit filesystem support into their OS.
          At the very least, this is going to mean they’ll have tons of such workarounds and gotchas, which will make it difficult for new devs, but also offer more surface area for bugs/vulnerabilities.

        • Well, and then there’s some urban legends. For example, I’ve heard that the entirety of Windows is in one giant monorepo. I just quickly peaked into a supposed copy of the Windows XP leak and that did look the part…

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• MonkderDritte@feddit.de ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Well, going from ‘hot garbage’ to ‘not garbage’, they have a long road ahead.

  source
• fluckx@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  But we just bought tool X that is ISO certified AND soc2. How are we not secure yet? Does the tool not work?!?

  source