I know it’s semantics, but if your great-gramps would time travel to today, he would ask about your pocket TV, and you would reply nah, it’s a smartphone
Comment on Because of smartphones, pocket TVs were never a thing.
ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 9 months ago
if you primarily watch videos with your smartphone, couldn’t you call it a pocket tv?
BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 9 months ago
MxM111@kbin.social 9 months ago
Which is actually not smartphone, but a general purpose computer with cell internet connection that can be used for many things, one of those is actually calling.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Or, I would reply yes, totally. It’s called a smart phone, and load up the literal television app called YouTube TV
NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 9 months ago
No, because your smartphone needs internet, tv signals reach way more places, and more reliably.
Especially since broadcast tv, in America ya damn Limeys, is free, while internet is either very localized (WiFi, etc…) which may or may not be free, or wide spread (Cell phones, Satellites, etc…) which are definitely pay.
BorgDrone@lemmy.one 9 months ago
Do they?
I can watch my local TV channels from the other side of the planet. I don’t think the signal reaches that far.
NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 9 months ago
With internet
BorgDrone@lemmy.one 9 months ago
Your point?