Comment on We can do all three things at once

atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• cooopsspace@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Yeah, principles.

  The principles that it won’t be profitable for 50+ years if at all.

  And it will mean we are stuck with fossil fuels for just as long.

  source

  • atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The principles that it won't be profitable for 50+ years if at all.

    Sure, and your source for that is a green politician or an anti-nuclear thinktank?

    So I'm all for doing anything to survive, preferably sometime in the last 50 years.

    "Anything" for greens somehow doesn't include nuclear for greens 🤷‍♂

    source

    • cooopsspace@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Because the money is better spent elsewhere.

      Yet if we plan for nuclear it’ll be like “oh no, we’ve had project delays and cost blowouts” like they do every time and we will just burn fossil fuels the whole time and die anyway.

      Also the anti nuclear green think tanks are called educated people. And all you’d need to do is look at the European failures and shut downs to know the costs don’t add up.

      source

      • atro_city@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Also the anti nuclear green think tanks are called educated people.

        LMAO. Your brain must be so much bigger than that of physicists who are proponents of nuclear energy. Mr "disagreement with my opinion means you're wrong".

        Very convincing argumentation

        source