So maybe that’s why they didn’t want to allow that?
Comment on Apple's 'incredibly private' Safari not so private in Europe
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 months agoThat’s not what’s said in the article. At all. What so ever.
The problem isn’t suddenly allowing third party browsers. It’s that Apple’s implementation to allow that in Safari sends out info about sites visited with those app stores. It allows snooping of what 3rd party things people use.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 months ago
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 months ago
No, the problem is with APPLE’S IMPLEMENTATION of HOW Apple allows third party stores through Safari. NOT with third party browsers themselves. Please learn to read.
ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 8 months ago
The problem isn’t suddenly allowing third party browsers.
The problem here - the ONLY problem - is using a fucking browser to do everything, instead of… you know, browsing.
An app store app should be installed as an app. It has no business being specially handled by a browser.
That’s what you get when you turn a browser into a mini OS: the thing’s attack surface increases by orders of magnitude.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Well that’s just Apple “innovation”. You’re clearly not brilliant enough to understand the long term plan of
greedy moronsApple.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Apple: “SeE WhAt YoU MaDe mE Do!”