Comment

I absolutely love how developers can do their own thing on Linux, as they say scratch your own itch.
Problem with Gnome was that the team was extremely arrogant, completely dismissed any criticism, and rejected contributions. Gnome was a weird community project that didn’t give a shit about the community, and abandoned everything they used to stand for.
I wouldn’t normally have a problem with that, except Gnome’s behavior was harmful to the Linux community as a whole IMO, they abandoned their own community and made life for other desktop projects harder, if they wanted to create an environment that supported Gnome together with other desktop environments, and for other desktop environments that wanted to allow to run Gnome apps somewhat seamlessly.
How you cannot see that that is harmful and detrimental to Linux as a whole I don’t understand.

source

Sort:hotnew top

TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

I just found that today Gnome is now only about 20% according to Arch packagestats. I can’t find good stats for marketshare between Linux desktops.

You can’t seriously believe Arch is representative of the overall Linux desktop space…

source
- Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Feel free to find better stat, as I write I can’t find a good stat, so pretty clearly I don’t expect it to be actually representative.
  
  source
  - redcalcium@lemmy.institute ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Yeah, it’s kinda hard to find good stats because Linux users hate telemetry.
    
    source
    Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Absolutely, I’m a bit puzzled why I’m downvoted on that one? 🤔
    
    source
dsemy@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
I don’t get why this comment is so unpopular.

You made baseless claims:

when Gnome changed to Gnome Shell Linux marketshare clearly declined. That Linux has begun to rise again, is definitely not because of Gnome Shell but more despite of it.

I’m assuming you don’t actually have data on this or you’d share it.

You keep insulting Gnome developers. You say you love how developers can do their own thing and then call the Gnome team arrogant for doing just that, in the very next sentence. They don’t have to accept criticism, they don’t have to accept contributions (think about this logically, would you want your favorite project to accept any criticism and any contributions?).

You say they hurt the ability to run Gnome apps on other desktops with Gnome 3, but both from research and personal experience I can’t figure out what you mean (I use and have used Gnome 3 apps outside of Gnome), and you don’t give any examples (despite your comment being pretty long).
source