Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?"
qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months agoI think the system is fundamentally evil becouse it is founded on something that I think is evil. This is my opinion. You can disagree with it, but tell me why.
Comment on "Yeah, but what if we used AI?"
qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months agoI think the system is fundamentally evil becouse it is founded on something that I think is evil. This is my opinion. You can disagree with it, but tell me why.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I don’t know where you learned English, but “fundamentally” is not usually used for things that are subjective.
qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months ago
I’m not a native speaker but the way I understand it fundamentally means “at the most basic level”.
www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/fundamentally
I can’t find anything paradoxical in the statement “I think the system is evil at the most basic level”, but if you do, I’m sorry for misspeaking, I hope that after this clarification you can see what I was trying to convey.
Will you now respond to the substance of the argument or continue to avoid it by asking questions and arguing about semantics?
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The substance of your argument is based on your subjective opinion. There’s nothing to answer. Taxation will continue to be a thing regardless of your subjective opinion.
qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months ago
The substance of the argument is why do you think taxation is better than the system I proposed. I told you why I think taxation is bad and I told you why I think my system would be better.
Your response: