Comment on Commodore 64 claimed to outperform IBM's quantum system — sarcastic researchers say 1 MHz computer is faster, more efficient, and decently accurate

palordrolap@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• TheFlopster@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I agree. I knew the image in the thumbnail wasn’t a Commodore 64, because it had an @ symbol above the 2. Nope! Shoulda been quotation marks there (then).

  But when I click on the article, I think that first picture is right. At least, it looks like what I remember.

  source
• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The picture in the article is an original Commodore 64, the thumbnail however is not.
  Where is the thumbnail from? Is it some sort of HTML extension when referencing something, that you can include a thumbnail, which is not visible when you read the article.
  I see these “kind of fake” thumbnails everywhere!!!

  source

  • palordrolap@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Someone in the article's own comments section makes the same assertion as me, so my guess is that they've corrected the image on the article and the Fediverse's various caches still have the original.

    source
• ares35@kbin.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  so, tom's swings-and-misses... again?

  source