Comment on RIP Bram Moolenaar, the author of vim text editor
tun@lemmy.world 1 year ago
RIP, Mr. Bram Moolenaar.
Thank you for the VIM.
Now the time has come for the VIM future.
Comment on RIP Bram Moolenaar, the author of vim text editor
tun@lemmy.world 1 year ago
RIP, Mr. Bram Moolenaar.
Thank you for the VIM.
Now the time has come for the VIM future.
kittenbridgeasteroid@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Or we could all just move to nano and be less frustrated.
panja@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Damn people here really hate nano 😂
markstos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Na, it’s just that a memorial post is a time to pause the editor wars, if only for a moment, and pay respect.
havokdj@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nah I’ll pass on that, nano feels dirty.
panja@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean it was on a response with a link detailing the single threaded nature of vim development… I don’t think it was inappropriate
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
ed is the standard text editor.
tun@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I started with nano, learnt vim and now using neovim.
lawrence@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I am waiting for neovim 1.0, using vim until there.
tun@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Neovim is stable even though it is still using minor version number.
The eco system booms after 0.5 (lua support, lsp and treesitter) and after lazy.nvim.