Comment on magic beneath the forests

• onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I just think there are better ways to say nature is awesome without adding mystics, new age stuff, or fantastical expressions to it. Then it starts turning into non-science.

  Anti Commercial-AI license

  source

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I like those better ways too, but I’m me and you’re you. I think the vulgarisation like in the op are good and useful as well. We’re not talking about Deepak Chopra here, just a little mycological poetry.

    I would use the word “special” rather than mystical, but the awesomeness of reality can often feel mystical. I think it’s ok to play with that as long as you aren’t making any serious claims, like we should order our social structure around fungi deity or something

    source

    • cheesymoonshadow@lemmings.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I feel exactly the same way as how you described it. I think the quote from OP about the universe experiencing itself actually originated from Carl Sagan, who is as scientific and atheistic as you could ask for. It’s just a play on words.

      And then you have the likes of Deepak Chopra, who is the most disingenuous woowoo-talking charlatan in existence. If he said something like that, he would mean it literally.

      source