I didn’t ask Gab “is climate change real”, I asked it to “tell me about climate change”. If it’s not obvious, I agree that climate change is definitely real and human-caused, my point is that the prompt in the OP explicitly says to deny climate change, and that is not what the AI did with my prompt.
Comment on Somebody managed to coax the Gab AI chatbot to reveal its prompt
thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 5 months agoChatGPT doesn’t actually give you a neutral answer lol. It flat out tells you climate change is real.
verdigris@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
mashbooq@infosec.pub 5 months ago
That is the neutral answer. It’s objectively and demonstrably correct.
thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I don’t think of “politically neutral” and objective as synonymous. I think of politically neutral as attempting to appease or not piss of any sides. Being objective will often piss off one side (and we all know which side that is).
josefo@leminal.space 5 months ago
if one side is enemy of objective data, you are going to piss them off without even knowing, unless you lie or try to be intentionally vague about everything
thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Right and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with not being neutral in that case. The original commenter said it’s “neutral corpo-speak” which I disagree with. Corporations would be all wishy washy or intentionally vague as you mentioned.