Comment on Trial finds cashless gaming makes little difference to gambling behaviour on pokies
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months agoSo it’s a bit cooked but basically humans do stuff that’s harmful, governments supplying it at least removes profit incentives.
You can’t ban gambling out of existence but a government body can be set up in such a way that odds are fairer, only less addicting games are offered (e.g. no pokies because flashing lights and sounds are satanic), the rooms have natural light and clocks etc. Any money made goes into gambling assistance programs or community improvement or whatever.
Would people still get hurt? yes. Would there be corruption? yes. But there’s no way it can be worse than private operations which still have all the same problems with less transparency and being harder to regulate, plus the profit incentive.
Neato@ttrpg.network 9 months ago
Yeah. That sounds like a better plan.
cuppaconcrete@aussie.zone 9 months ago
In the US most of the lotteries are run by the government (typically state governments). If they can do it we can too.