It does become not a technical discussion but a philosophical one pretty soon. I’m not sure humans can accurately cite their sources either—yes they can be interviewed and claim X or Y as a big influence on their artistic work. But how do they know that? Do they know that more than an AI asked the same question?
Comment on How much did photography "stole" painter jobs ?
ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year agoBut it does hold water. The original image might not be contained within the model, but the fact that it was trained on stolen data makes it problematic. Even if humans do the same, an AI model is not a human, and therefore needs to adhere to different rules.
dave@feddit.uk 1 year ago
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If a painter looks at another artisis painting, then decided to paint something similar, is that stealing?
NotSpez@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Also: scale. If you’re a painter inspired by other painters, your output will still be limited. AI is a different story in this regard.