I fucking love that you write “one of many many many sources” and then link a singular source twice.
Comment on Czech government invests six billion euros in new nuclear reactors
Hugohase@startrek.website 5 months agoI am sorry, but reality says otherwise.
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
You linked the same study that doesn’t even pose the hypothesis for which is energy source is more green. All that study did was linked high GDP with lower emissions overall, and low GDP with higher emissions overall and suggested that nuclear and renewables are incompatible, which is pure bullshit. Look at Norway, Sweden, France, Paraguay, Iceland, and Nepal who manages ~90% of total energy production via renewables and nuclear.
If countries want to reach 100% renewable energy throughout the full year in-house, they will have to use multiple sources due to how cyclical it can be. At least until energy storage gets completely reinvented.
Hugohase@startrek.website 5 months ago
Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
It’s you who can’t read. The whole correlation is flawed by design, hence ignored by me. If you read the limitations section, they explain how they lack specific data for a comprehensive comparison, so they aggregate the data and ignore “economic costs, integrated resource planning, reliability, lifecycle impacts, risk profiles, waste management, and ecological, political and security impacts”. Which are important factors to ignore, which completely changes the results when incorporated by other studies.
Hugohase@startrek.website 5 months ago
I only accept data that supports my worldview is a nice argument. Have fun not learning stuff.