Comment on What's your take on Bluesky?
SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 months agoI don’t know much about their protocol
As far as I understand, Bluesky is basically a central authority in their protocol. I wouldn’t really call that better than ActivityPub.
Plopp@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Well, there are many different aspects to take into account. I was thinking more of how inefficient AP is when it comes to system resources and network usage, and some other things I can’t remember that made me go “yikes” when I read it. Also how it’s used for things the protocol doesn’t really have support for, so devs make their own solutions that are now part of the AP Fediverse even though the protocol itself, that is the backbone of the thing in question, doesn’t support the things that is a part of the thing. It seems a big mess in many ways, and I believe that Bluesky doesn’t have those issues.
SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 months ago
Can you be more specific? How is AP inefficient? What are the nonstandard extensions that devs have made?