But knowing is required for not being dumb.
Comment on CFCs
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 8 months agoKnowing isn’t required for either believing or disbelieving.
rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 months ago
Comment on CFCs
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 8 months agoKnowing isn’t required for either believing or disbelieving.
But knowing is required for not being dumb.
Leg@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Something seems to have triggered you. Are you okay?
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Don’t be defensive, address my point instead.
Leg@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You’re not really making any meaningful points for me to interact with, and as such I have nothing in myself to defend. You seem to just be really cranky and hostile.
That’s where your downvotes are coming from, by the way. You’re not appealing to reason; you’re more just being kind of a dick.
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Well the fellow that I replied to implied that understanding is necessary for agreement/disagreement. And then I said that it ain’t so.
So you might try addressing that very definite and relevant point.
TangoUndertow@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You don’t have a point, other than you should just trust your gut or something?
bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee 8 months ago
I think that you are too dumb for this conversation.