There’s no need to mention their race right? Unless it was a racially motivated attack, which I don’t remember coming up.
Explain how.
Explain how.
There’s no need to mention their race right? Unless it was a racially motivated attack, which I don’t remember coming up.
Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 9 months ago
In an alternate universe where segregation never ended…
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 9 months ago
White men are the most dangerous segment of the population, which is clearly shown by violent crime statistics. There is a reason that rural census tracts (which are overwhelmingly white) are the most dangerous places to live.
John_McMurray@lemmy.world 9 months ago
? The fuck? The statistics don’t show anything like that and it’s not polite to discuss what they really show.
Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 9 months ago
bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/revcoa18.pdf
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Arrests and convictions are not a valid proxy for violent acts or crimes committed. If you knew absolutely anything about this area of study you’d be aware of that. Have fun with your willful ignorance.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 months ago
That is not what I said, nor is it true. While males are 97.7% of the NIJ’s Index of Mass Shooters, only about 50% were white which is lower than their proportion of the total population. However, depression amongst that demographic is higher and growing, and mental illnesses correlate highly with those who harm others and themselves, so I’m just saying the Vegas Shooter ticked every box on the proverbial check list.
dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 9 months ago
According to that link ~30% of the US population are white men but 52% of mass shootings are perpetrated by white men.
How is this not evidence that white men are the most dangerous people in the US? Not in terms of being likely to commit a crime of desperation but rather to be an utter loser and decide to shoot a bunch of random people out of pure hate?