Comment on The Terrible Costs of a Phone-Based Childhood
Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
This study found a link by looking at TV viewing, nevermind phones and tablets.
earth.com/…/toddler-screen-time-linked-to-atypica…
It makes sense in a way. How we process the world might be a bit messed up with we were exposed to lots of bright shapes and loud sounds doing impossible things before our senses were fully developed.
Deadful@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Sorry, but that’s not what the actual JAMA research study says:
To me, making the jump to say “Screen time directly linked to autism and ADHD” based on the data in this study is like saying “American football playing is associated with specific types of head trauma, including the types seen in car accident victims, but further research is needed to understand why” and then writing an article saying “AMERICAN FOOTBALL PLAYING DIRECTLY LINKED TO CAR ACCIDENTS!!!”
Here is a link to the actual research paper instead of a badly written sensationalistic article if anyone is interested:
jamanetwork.com/journals/…/2813443
Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
Interesting. What does the paragraph above the one you posted say?
Deadful@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It says absolutely nothing about autism and ADHD, as you can see:
I copied and shared the portion of the summary that provides interpretation for the findings because it’s the only place where autism is noted, ADHD is totally absent.
Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
I mean, if you think that they aren’t talking about ADHD and autism there, after reading the article, well okay then.
The paper comes as close to saying ‘direct link’ as these papers ever do. It’s quite difficult to prove a direct link and there are consequences for using that language inaccurately, when you’re publishing in a respected journal (at least there is supposed to be)
Pop-sci articles are usually going to try to hook readers with their headlines. Not being beholden to the same standards, they are free to read between the lines, as it were. One could say it’s BS but there’s a lot of substance there to refute.
Its an important article that shouldn’t be ignored, and if people want more details, they can get to the JAMA investigation from the link provided at the end.