Comment on It's good to be federated.
exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 months agoIf it’s unknowable, then statements about whether it secretly exists are pointless. It might as well not.
Comment on It's good to be federated.
exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 months agoIf it’s unknowable, then statements about whether it secretly exists are pointless. It might as well not.
fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 3 months ago
It’s unknowable, but I think it’s rational to conclude that there is something. We can’t directly experience it, but we can experience something which means there’s something out there.
I don’t buy the “we live in the matrix” or “deceitful god” arguments.
exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Ah, so your argument is there cannot be an effect without a cause. We have perceptions, so they must have causes, and you believe those causes must be a real world.
However, this is a bit of a strange thing to think. Because if there exists a world, then there exists a big bang, and we are right back at the problem of effects without causes. The argument against effects without causes does not favour realism any more than soulism.
fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 3 months ago
I agree with the first paragraph, but not the second. Why should there be a big bang? That’s based on the assumption that you can trust your perceptions, which I’m essentially rejecting.
In other words, is there something giving me perceptions? I think so. Why is it there? Who knows. Why is there anything? Same answer.
exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Okay, but that doesn’t solve the causeless effect problem. The world is as much a causeless effect as perceptions without a world. So your proposed resolution to the problem is “there’s probably a world out there I’ll never know and I don’t have to reckon with its causeless effects, I just have to push the causeless effect out of my direct knowledge”?