Comment on Immich vs Ente ?
litchralee@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Downside: breaking changes are fairly common AFAIK.
By my extremely cursory reading, this stopped being a problem after the v2.0.0 release, when they adopted semantic versioning. According, breaking changes would only occur when the major version number is rolled. And version v3.0.0 was just released 5 days ago, whereas v2.0.0 was released in October 2025.
It may be down to taste, but I view 9 months as being acceptable, given the breadth of features offered and the folks willing to put effort into the project.
warmaster@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yeah, not too bad, but not exactly great either. Do they backport fixes? Do they maintain something like an LTS release?
litchralee@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Is that something you’re looking for? As a practical matter, the effort to maintain multiple release branches and backports – compared to the norm of just maintaining a single main branch – is an outsized effort, available to only well-founded FOSS projects, usually by having an industry sponsor that makes it a priority.
I posit that the grand majority of selfhosted FOSS software, by project count, does not have back ported branches. And so production environments will want to set up an offline validation setup to evaluate update, prior to making the switch. Not convenient, sure, but not exactly insurmountable either.