Comment on AI hiring tools may be filtering out the best job applicants
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 8 months agoI dunno what country you’re in, but in my country you are required by law to have a valid reason to reject a job candidate. That reason can be pretty simple, such as “your application was not as strong as other candidates” but you need to be able to back that claim up if you’re challenged (and you can be challenged on it).
The recommended approach is to have a list of selection criteria, and carefully consider each one then write it down and keep a record of the decision for a while, incase you end up on the wrong end of a discrimination lawsuit. Candidates have the right to ask why they were unsuccessful (and they should ask - to find out what they can do better to improve their chances next time. As a hiring manager I would note down anyone who asks and consider offering them a job in the future, bypassing the normal recruitment process).
If your selection criteria includes “they need to wear nice clothes” then you’re treading on very dangerous territory and could easily be charged. The damages is commonly six months pay at the salary of the position they applied for, and can also include a court order for you not to be involved in the hiring process going forward.
Vanth@reddthat.com 8 months ago
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Australia. It’s not clearly illegal but it’s dangerous territory. Candidates have a general right to be treated as equals and you need to reject someone for reasons that are relevant to the job position.
Vanth@reddthat.com 8 months ago
bane_killgrind@kbin.social 8 months ago
Being recorded and interacting with someone in person are hugely different. Even
First of all, a person would give nonverbal feedback.
Secondly, there is all manner of body language that could be used for emphasis that doesn't make sense doing to a camera.