stoy@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
This is a bad idea, I would never work for someone who openly admits that they will only make arbitrary payments to me based on nothing but a whim.
Nah, payment needs to be consistent and based on the number of times an artist gets played.
rglullis@communick.news 11 months ago
How is that different from the current situation? For most people, supporting indie artists is already an optional thing, those using Patreon could cancel “on a whim” as well, no?
Doesn’t that create a huge skew towards the pop-stars, who are already making money through other means (touring) anyway?
stoy@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
Do you really compare someone cancelling their pateron and a company taking all the money that customers have paid from the artists they want to support?
Sure, the payment would be skewed, but that is easily remidied by not having pop music on the plattform.
rglullis@communick.news 11 months ago
I think you misunderstood. What I mean is that the customer will choose how much of their allocated budget goes to each artist.
grant@toast.ooo 11 months ago
I would definitely reword your original post, it’s very misleading with how it’s worded now
(Eg “How I feel” -> “how individual users feel”)