Comment on Linear rail mod on Anycubic Kobra 2
rambos@lemm.ee 7 months agoMy frame is as straight as I can get it, but that doesn’t really affect the movement on X or Y axes independently
I thought your frame acts also like a rail for wheels.
I was not aware that the “cheap” linear rails would be just as bad as the design currently used
I think they should be better, but smooth rods and wheels work quite good as well. Linear rails are better than smooth rods and smooth rods are better than wheels, but only if built correctly.
There is obviously some missalignement in your setup and the reason why you cant fix that might persist after upgrade. What concerns me the most is mounting Y linear rails not parallel enough (they might not move at all due to binding, while smooth rods or wheels could still work)
DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
There is a single extrusion, in the middle, running parallel to the Y axis below the bed, with rods on both sides that the bearings travel on. So it’s not affected by the squareness of the frame.
Likewise for the X axis, there is a single extrusion mounted between the two vertical extrusions, with rods on that the print head travels on, again this is not affected by squareness either.
Squareness of course comes in to play when the print head is positioned relative to the bed, but I actually have decent (and consistent) print quality.
rambos@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Using single rail for each axis would exclude most of the issues I was concerned about. When I mentioned frame squareness, I was thinking about all geometric tolerances including rails being prallel/perpendicular to the frame.
Honestly my knowledge about linear rails becomes kinda useless after seing how people use them on their printers. Example: mounting them on alu extrusions or using them as a frame should be wrong, but looks like many people have good results.
Again, someone who solved that issue on the same or simmilar machine might be much more of a help than anything I wrote