The reality is that a bunch of the content creators are here rather than on a centralised billionaire/VC backed platform. Surely if those content creators wanted their content on BlueSky they would post there. I know for example that I personally declined invitations, so why would I want my toots and Lemmy posts there?
I’m not a fan of Bluesky, but to call it “centralized billionaire backed platform” makes no sense anymore. They are opening for federation already, and Jack Dorsey is now just shilling Bitcoin on Nostr.
sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 9 months ago
The reality is that a bunch of the content creators are here rather than on a centralised billionaire/VC backed platform. Surely if those content creators wanted their content on BlueSky they would post there. I know for example that I personally declined invitations, so why would I want my toots and Lemmy posts there?
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 9 months ago
You signed up for federation when you joined lemmy and mastodon. Your posts federating to other servers should not be a surprise.
sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 9 months ago
To ActivityPub services. BlueSky doesn’t support the protocol
PlantJam@lemmy.world 9 months ago
So if/when they do this is a non issue, right? Or have they confirmed they won’t ever be supporting activitypub?
dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
Not true. You’re pushing content to Diaspora, hubzilla, PubCrawl, Streams and many other protocols that are bridged to ActivityPub
rglullis@communick.news 9 months ago
I’m not a fan of Bluesky, but to call it “centralized billionaire backed platform” makes no sense anymore. They are opening for federation already, and Jack Dorsey is now just shilling Bitcoin on Nostr.
sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 9 months ago
Image
rglullis@communick.news 9 months ago
My choice of present continuous was deliberate.