Nutanix has its community edition which is free.
Comment on Broadcom terminates VMware's free ESXi hypervisor
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Some alternatives:
-
Incus - After canonicals takeover of LXD a fork of it called Incus was created. Supporting both virtual machines and linux containers. Free open-source with paid support.
github.com/lxc/incus -
virt-manager - For home usage without clusters and the like a simple Linux host with kvm/qemu/libvirt/virt-manager usually works just fine.
github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager -
Cockpit Project - Cockpit can be used to manage both virtual machines and podman. Personally I use it in tandem with virt-manager.
github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-machines github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-podman github.com/oVirt/cockpit-ovirt -
Proxmox - KVM/LXC Hypervisor based on Debian. Supports clustering and High-Availability. Free open-source with paid support. github.com/proxmox
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 months ago
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I find mentions on their homepage that they love open source but I can’t find any repository for the hypervisor itself.
Nutanix AHV is based upon CentOS KVM.
nutanixbible.com/5a-book-of-ahv-architecture.htmlBrkdncr@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’m not sure if it’s open source, but it’s free.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 months ago
There’s also harvester. The spec requirements are pretty heavy compared to some of the other options though.
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Harvester is a modern, open, interoperable, hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution built on Kubernetes.
github.com/harvester/harvester
ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 months ago
XCP-NG, which I think was split off from an old Citrix branch oray be a clone, but it has a pretty solid set of features. Costs nothing unless you buy support or use their paid management appliance, but there’s an open version of that available as well.
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
mint_tamas@lemmy.world 4 months ago
What’s the background of the lxd-incus fork? On the project page they just state that it was forked after Canonical took over lxd - but what does that mean, exactly? How did they take over an open project? Was there a technical reason for a fork?
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’d say from a business perspective this is the major thing:
Real license of LXDPer the commit message performing the re-licensing, all further contributions will be under the AGPLv3 license and all contributions from Canonical employees have been re-licensed to AGPLv3.
However, Canonical does not own the copyright on any contribution from non-employees, such as the many changes they have imported from Incus over the past few months. Those therefore remain under the Apache 2.0 license that they were contributed under.
As a result, LXD is now under a weird mix of Apache 2.0 and AGPLv3 with no clear metadata indicating what file or what part of each file is under one license or the other.
This is likely to make it very “fun” for anyone performing licensing reviews to evaluate LXD for adoption in their environment.
Grabbed from this blog stgraber.org/…/lxd-now-re-licensed-and-under-a-cl…
Matty_r@programming.dev 4 months ago
Of these, I can recommend Proxmox. Its a decent learning curve coming from VMware, but once you learn the interface you’ll be able to configure things much like you would in Vsphere/ESXi.
I recently started using the Proxmox Backup Server as well, and its pretty amazing. I got myself a super cheap VPS with 400gb storage, setup wireguard and installed the backup server. You just point Proxmox directly to it and it’ll do encrypted backups, scheduling, and easily keep any number of versions of your backups.