Comment on AI Launches Nukes In ‘Worrying’ War Simulation: ‘I Just Want to Have Peace in the World’

sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They didn’t. They used LLMs.

  source

  • sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Which are chat bots.

    source

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      A chat bot can be an LLM, but an LLM is not inherently a chat bot.

      source
  • forrgott@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A glorified chatbot, in other words.

    source

    • tabular@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If one is feeling cynical; humans are chatbots in shoes.

      source

      • forrgott@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I don’t know if I love or hate your comment. (Yes, you’re right, shut up.) Well played, Internet stranger.

        source
      • kibiz0r@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Searle speaks frankly. Challenging those who deny the existence of consciousness, he wonders how to argue with them. “Should I pinch [those people] to remind them they are conscious?” remarks Searle. “Should I pinch myself and report the results in the Journal of Philosophy?”

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      In other words, you don’t really really know what LLMs are.

      source
  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What do you think large language model means? If you want desicion making, you should train a model on data relevant to said desicion making. ^

    This is like being confused as to why a hammer does a shit job of driving screws.

    source

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      What do you think large language model means?

      Not a chat bot, because that’s not what they are. And saying so is both reductive and wholly incorrect.

      If you want desicion making, you should train a model on data relevant to said desicion making.

      Partly true. There’s more to it than throwing domain specific data at the training set.

      source
  • Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s what the “language” part of “Large Language Model” means. It processes, predicts and generates language. You can omit the chat part if you want, but it’s still a text prompt to text response generator. The chat part just feeds it back the last couple messages for context. It doesn’t understand anything.

    source

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s what the “language” part of “Large Language Model” means. It processes, predicts and generates language.

      Language does not mean “text”. It’s not “Large Text Generator”. The core definition of the word language is “communication”.

      An LLM isn’t (always) trained exclusively on text. And even those that are become greater than the raw sum of its parts. What that means is that the model can learn context not in the raw text itself.

      The chat part just feeds it back the last couple messages for context

      Partially true. There’s more to it though.

      It doesn’t understand anything.

      And neither does antivirus, but it still does its job.

      source