Comment on No, 3 million electric toothbrushes were not used in a DDoS attack
kn33@lemmy.world 4 months agoAre you talking about electric toothbrushes in general? Because I’m pretty sure they’re regarded as more effective than manual toothbrushes
Alk@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Yeah and some of the best toothbrushes as reported by every single dentist I’ve had over the last 10 years all have Bluetooth in them, or have a model with Bluetooth. They’re not good because they have Bluetooth, they’re good because they’re good, and adding Bluetooth to an already expensive toothbrush is negligible to the price so they all do it.
Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 months ago
OK. Maybe I’ve just been out of the loop, but what on earth would you need BT in a toothbrush for? So you can pair it with an app and track your brushing while someone else also tracks and uses this data for profit?
flathead@lemm.ee 4 months ago
The primary use case is for making sure kids and elderly loved ones are brushing their teeth and keeping the brush charged. Also supposedly senses if all teeth are being properly cleaned, although based on reviews that sounds like a stretch. But yeah, the aggregated data is probably marketable somehow - I didn’t check their privacy policies.
Electric toothbrushes are a thing. It’s understandable that the vendors would like a rationale to track usage. Not beyond the bounds of possibility that in ten years it may be impossible to buy an electric toothbrush that doesn’t track usage and try to phone home to report it.
Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I’ve had an electric for well over 10 years(same one). They are so much better than normal brushes IMO.