I played the game with a friend years ago and it was a great experience for the price. Buying early access on promises is a gamble. If you buy the game for what it is I don’t see the issue.
pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Aaand this is the gamble of buying early access.
AudaciousArmadillo@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
rescue_toaster@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Ehh… Im not sure it was a gamble in this case. Valheim was pretty complete in its early access form when I bought it like nearly 5 years ago. It also has overwhelmingly positive reviews. I think it’s also delivered more than its original roadmap, which wasn’t much past mistlands.
They stated it will still receive bug fixes, just perhaps no new content.
I think I paid $20 for it and I feel I got my money for it, even though I haven’t even played it since before the mistlands update released. I plan on firing it up again after the deep north 1.0 releases and imagine having a lot of fun with it.
RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 1 month ago
While I agree that Vahiem is a great value proposition and a lot of fun, IronGate’s first roadmap clearly stated that the ocean biome was going to get its own update.