Comment on Across America, clean energy plants are being banned faster than they're being built

• Pips@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You absolutely can refute it. Just ask for proof.

  source

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    They’ll point to articles on Breitbart and other sites that are even less trustworthy.

    source
• Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I hate that. They’ll just say something like “well how can you support solar panels when it kills the rare ballet fork bird?! Or when the solar panels kill the nearby trees!? Or when the toxic chemicals leak into the streams and the kill the river!?”

  It’s just like this slew of crap and you can’t possibly know it’s totally crap when you start talking to them. Then you go back research it and it turns out it’s from some (typically CCP or Russian financially backed) fake news website “pRoMOTinG fReeDoM aNd tHe AMeRicAn wAY.”

  Then they just don’t want to hear about how freedom4everything.scam is a scam and think you’re being political and close minded for insisting they check these things out and look for collaborating sources with more credibility, NYTimes, Washington Post, WSJ, etc.

  Then that turns into a whole “but the NYTimes is too liberal to ever mention mutant fish caused by renewable energy” … and it just goes on and on…

  source

  • Asafum@feddit.nl ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t know how well it works in the end, but when I see that kind of stuff from people I usually say “I’m not going to tell you who to listen to, but try not to use sources that are named anything politically charged. No “patriot.grift” site no “RealMuricanDaily.bs” no “StarSpangledReport.asshat” anyone who chooses a name like that is broadcasting a political bias.”

    source