Honestly it was just a good game. I saw it attracting both Potterheads and non-Potterheads. (I would not consider myself a Potterhead).
Does it have a bunch of replay value? Not really (neither do a lot of games). But man, that initial playthrough was just really good. It also looks like I clocked 113 hours on the game, so that’s a pretty decent return to me.
Also, despite the source material and the author, it had a lot of very inclusive elements, which were a nice touch.
samus12345@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s also on every platform, including the Switch, while TotK is just on the Switch.
garretble@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yeah this feels like a Look What They Have to Do (release on every system) to Mimic a Fraction of Our Power (be Zelda) meme.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
More like: Even a bland game will sell more if it is released on multiple platforms, no matter how good the other game is.
Shadywack@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I think you just nailed it, this is exactly why.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 9 months ago
Yep it’s an unfair comparison. If Zelda was available on all platforms then it might have been a different story.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
But it isn’t, and that is the problem.