Comment on Insurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policy
billstickers@aussie.zone 11 months agoWhy do you think the rules exist in the first place. Because there is some hurt to somebody else. You just can’t see it.
Boinketh@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Tell me more about how me building a shed for myself that nobody else ever even looks at causes harm to anyone.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 11 months ago
An electrical fire that starts in your shed isn’t confined to your property by magic force fields. Your improperly installed wiring is a threat to the neighborhood.
Boinketh@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Improperly wiring something up on your property with the risk of causing a fire makes that action no longer confined to your property, even if before the fire, all of the wiring is on your side of the line. There’s simply no reasonable way for just a shed without the accidental pyrotechnics can bring enough risk of harm to your neighbors that it could be considered a violation of their rights.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Unless, you know, it wasn’t built to code.
billstickers@aussie.zone 11 months ago
If it’s not built to code to code it can pose all sorts of safety hazards to your neighbours or future owners of your property. If you don’t bother getting approval you didn’t bother building it properly either.
At the slightly more silly end, your shed could lower the value of the neighbours property (because it looks like a meth lab, or just a general hillbilly grotto) and the law holds financial harm higher than physical harm most of the time.
Boinketh@lemm.ee 11 months ago
If it’s not to code, just tear it down before selling the place. A not up to code shed on your own property isn’t a threat to your neighbors unless they’re trespassing on your property. Arguing that it shouldn’t be allowed because it looks bad is the real-estate equivalent of trying to pass a law to force women to smile at all times so that men have eye candy.